Modelled scenarios, not client case studies

Commercial Solar Worked Examples

Thirteen modelled scenarios showing what a commercial solar system of a given size does for a given kind of building — generation, saving and payback at this site's standard assumptions. None of them is a real client or a real install.

Check any installer against these schemes — this site is an independent guide, not an installer

These are modelled worked examples of how solar panels for businesses perform across the UK — from a 65 kW care-home rooftop to an 850 kW food-production plant. Each one takes a plausible building and load profile for its sector and applies the same assumptions used throughout this site: 900-1,150 kWh per kWp of yield depending on region, a 24-32p/kWh grid tariff, 12p/kWh export under the Smart Export Guarantee, and 100% Annual Investment Allowance at a 25% corporation tax rate. They are not client projects; we publish this site and do not install.

Use them to see which variables matter for a building like yours — above all self-consumption, which is why the 24/7 sites pay back fastest. For the pricing behind the numbers see the 100kW solar system cost breakdown and the full commercial solar cost guide, or compare finance routes in business solar panels. For sector-specific economics, jump to warehouses, factories, hotels or schools — or check whether the maths works for you in are commercial solar panels worth it?

75 kW on a Bristol office (modelled)

Modelled scenario

A 45-person agency in a converted warehouse, electricity bill around £18,000 a year, daytime office load.

System
75 kW (about 138 panels, one inverter)
Modelled annual saving
£14,500
Modelled payback
6.5 years
Modelled generation
68,000 kWh/yr

Assumptions

Modelled on asset finance over six years; the saving exceeds the repayment in year one at these assumptions.

180 kW on a Manchester light-industrial unit (modelled)

Modelled scenario

A plastics manufacturer in a 1990s estate unit, electricity spend around £58,000 a year, single daytime shift.

System
182 kW (about 335 panels)
Modelled annual saving
£42,000
Modelled payback
5.8 years
Modelled generation
168,000 kWh/yr

Assumptions

Capital purchase with AIA; 76% self-consumption assumed for a single-shift load.

320 kW on a Cambridge R&D facility (modelled)

Modelled scenario

A 24/7 laboratory and pilot line, electricity spend around £215,000 a year, high constant baseload.

System
320 kW (about 590 panels)
Modelled annual saving
£68,000
Modelled payback
5.4 years
Modelled generation
290,000 kWh/yr

Assumptions

AIA plus asset finance over seven years; 96% self-consumption assumed because the baseload never drops below the array output.

180 kW on a West Yorkshire 3PL warehouse (modelled)

Modelled scenario

A 6,000 sqm warehouse outside Leeds, electricity spend around £62,000 a year from lighting, fleet EV charging and refrigerated zones.

System
182 kW (about 335 panels)
Modelled annual saving
£42,000
Modelled payback
5.8 years
Modelled generation
168,000 kWh/yr

Assumptions

Capital purchase with AIA; 76% self-consumption assumed.

90 kW on a Cardiff Bay office (modelled)

Modelled scenario

A 60-person agency in a converted warehouse, electricity bill around £24,000 a year.

System
90 kW (about 167 panels)
Modelled annual saving
£17,500
Modelled payback
6.7 years
Modelled generation
82,000 kWh/yr

Assumptions

Asset finance over seven years.

550 kW ground-mount on a Lincolnshire packhouse (modelled)

Modelled scenario

A vegetable processing and packing facility with spare field adjacent, electricity spend around £165,000 a year, load peaking in the October-to-March harvest season.

System
550 kW ground-mount (about 1,015 panels)
Modelled annual saving
£105,000
Modelled payback
5.7 years
Modelled generation
525,000 kWh/yr

Assumptions

Planning permission and a full G99 connection assumed; 65% self-consumption because the load peaks in winter when the array produces least.

125 kW on a Brighton seafront hotel (modelled)

Modelled scenario

A 78-room Grade II listed hotel with a rear roof suitable for panels, electricity spend around £58,000 a year, daytime kitchen, hot-water and HVAC load.

System
125 kW (about 231 panels, rear roof only)
Modelled annual saving
£26,500
Modelled payback
7.1 years
Modelled generation
110,000 kWh/yr

Assumptions

Listed-building consent would be needed; a PPA route is modelled so no capital is spent. See the listed building guide.

720 kW on a Coventry automotive supplier (modelled)

Modelled scenario

A precision-machining facility on a two-shift pattern, electricity spend around £412,000 a year, profiled steel roof.

System
720 kW (about 1,330 panels)
Modelled annual saving
£186,000
Modelled payback
4.8 years
Modelled generation
684,000 kWh/yr

Assumptions

An IETF grant is modelled at 28% of eligible capex, which is within the published intensity range for that fund; 84% self-consumption assumed. Without the grant the payback is around 6.6 years.

480 kW on a Stoke-on-Trent ceramics manufacturer (modelled)

Modelled scenario

Kilns and drying tunnels running 24 hours, five days a week, electricity spend around £298,000 a year, part of the site in a conservation area.

System
480 kW (about 888 panels, ground-mount plus rooftop)
Modelled annual saving
£118,000
Modelled payback
5.2 years
Modelled generation
430,000 kWh/yr

Assumptions

Modelled with an IETF grant; rooftop consent in a conservation area is a planning question for the local authority.

210 kW on a Glasgow self-storage roof (modelled)

Modelled scenario

A four-storey self-storage building with a 3,200 sqm flat roof and low on-site demand of around £18,000 a year.

System
210 kW (about 388 panels, flat roof, ballasted)
Modelled annual saving
£24,000 (of which about £19,000 is SEG export income)
Modelled payback
6.4 years
Modelled generation
180,000 kWh/yr

Assumptions

An export-led scenario: 24% self-consumption, the rest exported at 12p/kWh (Octopus Outgoing fixed rate as at July 2026; supplier rates change on short notice).

850 kW on a Liverpool food production plant (modelled)

Modelled scenario

A ready-meal manufacturer running 24/7 with refrigeration, cooking and sterilisation load, electricity spend around £685,000 a year.

System
850 kW (about 1,575 panels, roof plus canopy)
Modelled annual saving
£218,000
Modelled payback
4.9 years
Modelled generation
765,000 kWh/yr

Assumptions

Modelled with an IETF grant at 29% of eligible capex and a 500 kWh battery; 92% self-consumption assumed for the 24/7 refrigeration baseload.

95 kW on a Trafford Park engineering unit (modelled)

Modelled scenario

A 48-staff metalwork firm, electricity spend around £52,000 a year, pre-2000 building needing its asbestos-cement roof replaced first.

System
95 kW (about 176 panels, after roof replacement)
Modelled annual saving
£23,500
Modelled payback
6.1 years
Modelled generation
88,000 kWh/yr

Assumptions

Roof replacement (around £64,000) and PV (around £87,000) modelled on a single scaffold; AIA applies to both. The payback shown is on the PV capex alone.

65 kW on a Norwich care home (modelled)

Modelled scenario

A 60-bed residential home with laundry and 24/7 baseload, electricity spend around £38,000 a year.

System
65 kW (about 120 panels) plus a 30 kWh battery
Modelled annual saving
£15,500
Modelled payback
6.4 years
Modelled generation
58,000 kWh/yr

Assumptions

91% self-consumption assumed with the battery shifting daytime surplus into the overnight resident load.

Quote